Compare The Strengths And Limitations Of A Range Of Assessment Methods

Comp are the strengths and limitations of a localize of assessment methods with reference to the inevitably of man-to-man pupilsDirect ceremonial in the primary consultation of gathering inference within NVQs as it is the most appropriate dash of presenting contrast occurring bear lulu. Youre watching the outlook function out his routine plough tho on the other(a)(a) hand the earth-closet buoydidate may per kind for you or exit very nervous with you watching. Performance picture demands consistent and repeated performance to the infallible standard.Work products talent be pre op considers, job descriptions, avocation rosters, check lists, accident forms, policies and procedures, records of phone calls, records of commensurateness communication book records.Work products about clients or staff should not be photocopied and raise in the portfolio. Assessors should view them and fill in the relevant sheet showing what was read, where its kept and for which PCs, it is relevant and attach it to an yard ledger sheet.The candidates contribution to the Work Product desires to be made clear. Putting in an organisational form _or_ system of government or procedure does not show evidence of the candidates skill or knowledge un slight at that place is evidence to show. They understand the policy or procedure or they have utilise it to their own area of work or they have trained their staff in it or they have determinationd the policy or procedure.Generally certificates only go out conclusion of attendance at a communication channel and are not a demonstrate of knowledge or competence. Assessors may accept to ask questions to test competence or knowledge. Some assessors now show validation of competence across defined situations and this provides thoroughly evidence. If candidates are keen to keep certificates in their portfolio dont discourage them, these could be kept in the Supporting Evidence section at the back.Check and fill in the Witness Status List at the front of the candidates portfolio with regards to who can be used as a witnessA witness should ideally hold the NVQ assessor award and be in a supervisory capacity to the candidate. Colleagues can present Witness statements but in a small environment issues of pressure and tacit consent can arise.Assessors can use witnesses to have the content of a Candidate composing by writing a backing statement at the end of the evidence record sheet. There are both types of witness the expert witness and the non-expert witness.An expert witness is someone effrontery the region of regularly and systematically observing and inform on candidates when they are performing tasks which bring evidence towards an NVQ and who is occupationally competent, with the necessary expertise in the area for which they are providing testimony. This information should be noted by the assessor.Briefed by the QA to project that they understand the standards to which the evidence relates because the expert witness testimony is more rigorous and covers a wider range of the candidates performance, it ordinarily has greater weight than the testimony of other witnesses. Non experts my also be used as witnesses, however, their evidence may be less reliable than that of the expert witness as they are unlikely to be acquainted(predicate) with the standards being assessed.Assessors must judge the hardiness of all witness testimonies. NVQ building blocks cannot be achieved by relying on witness testimony alone.Achievement of an NVQ unit will always involve observation of the candidate by a fitted assessor taking account of the evidence provided by witness testimony.Simulation This is where the candidate cannot provide evidence to cover PCs and whereasking questions may be insufficient. Examples might be dealing with a health emergency or working with someone who challenges the service.Recognising Prior LearningSTRENGHTS1. If a disciple had a previous rpl , it can be used to acquit their other assessments. Accrediting their prior learning assessment makes a learner feel that any work done in the past in this area was not a yen of time 2.qcf is giving learners the opportunity to use rpl more and they define it as a method of assessment that considers whether a learner can demonstrate that they can hit the requirements of a unit through knowledge, understandingand skills they already possess and do not motif to develop through a course of learning. Limitations1.may be time consuming for the assessor as will need to validate the rpl not all of it may be relevant to the current criteria they are assessing. 2.each assessor needs to check the direction for their relevant qualification, as the guidance varies for varied qualifications.Written questioningStrenghts1.Can take the form of essays, short firmness questions or multiple choice questions. gip and multiple choice questioning are examples of objective scrutiny as on tha t point is only one correct answer. This form of assessment is quick and easy to starting line wich means feedback can be given quickly to learners.Limitations1.Multiple choice questions can be guessed if the learner is unsure so they might not be the best way to get an accurate measure of whether the learner has understood something. If more depth on short answer questions is requied, essays can be used to assess understanding, literacy and high train comprehension although they take time for the learners to pinpoint and for the assessor to mark.Oral questioningStrenghts 1.Can form a collateral or backup assessment to check for comprehension. They can be used to support theory while the learner is practising their skills or at work and they can be adapted or changed quickly depending on the situation. 2.open oral questions should be used to hold out the information from the learner. Limitations1.Assessors should be elaborate not to use closed questions unless testing agreemen t.